Many tokens are marketed as ‘governance tokens’, giving holders the right to vote on protocol changes.
In theory, this is the ultimate form of digital democracy. In practice, governance is often dominated by a
few large whales or venture capital firms. You must evaluate whether your vote actually matters or if you
are just a passenger on a centralized ship.
Voter Apathy and Governance Attacks Most token holders do not participate in governance, leading to
low turnout. This makes it possible for a wealthy actor to buy enough tokens to force through a proposal
that benefits them at the expense of the protocol. This is known as a ‘governance attack’. Before investing
in a DAO, look at its voting history and the distribution of its tokens. If five wallets control eighty percent
of the vote, it is not decentralized.
The Value Capture of Governance Does holding a governance token actually provide financial value?
Some protocols redirect a portion of their fees to token holders who participate in voting. This creates a
clear link between the protocol’s success and the token’s price. If there is no fee-sharing or buy-back
mechanism, the governance token might be overvalued. True information gain comes from analyzing the
‘treasury’ and how the community decides to spend its capital
Bit Hits Disclaimer